I was trying to cure some boredom by clicking through wiki links (went from younger dryass inpact hypotheseis to mushrooms) when I hit on this, a new word for me, referring to a category of mushroom;
Subcubensis.The brief wikipedia page immediately caught my attention with this intro:
Quote:Psilocybe subcubensis is an entheogenic species of mushroom in the Hymenogastraceae family.[1] The mushroom contains the medicinal compounds psilocybin and psilocin.
A quick look at other pages seem to refer to psilocybe mushrooms as 'psychedelic'. It looks to be the original syntax of the entry by the history. I'm not sure I'm entirely on board, I think it just leads to confusion and is agenda-driven-
(even if the agenda is benevolent, and in this case is it really?) - maybe using 'potentially medicinal' along with the word psychedelic if someone wants to highlight a medical use?
There has been for a very long time an (I think) uneccessary debate surrounding what to call plants with
psychedelic compounds within them. All of the debates seem to emanate from a certain corner of the psychedelic culture- people who think they are best used ceremonially call them entheogens, those who want them in therapy sessions call them medicine, etc. I am perfectly happy and think that psychedelic is a great umbrella term; it rolls off the tongue nicely and was it not coined by none other than A. Huxley, perhaps the most dedicated intellectual to the
psychedelic experience we have ever seen, and therefore the word should be inviolable in my opinion. (If you are not familiar, google The Death of Aldous Huxley) Whatever, I am spending more words on it than it deserves, but just wanted to point that out and ask whhere any of you interested land on the whole thing?
Subcubensis wasn't nearly as interesting as an entry otherwise as I hoped, but it has kept me entertained through the writitng of this at least. Thanks, WP, mission accomplished.
Sine experientia nihil sufficienter sciri potest -Roger Bacon
*γνῶθι σεαυτόν*