We've Moved! Visit our NEW FORUM to join the latest discussions. This is an archive of our previous conversations...

You can find the login page for the old forum here.
CHATPRIVACYDONATELOGINREGISTER
DMT-Nexus
FAQWIKIHEALTH & SAFETYARTATTITUDEACTIVE TOPICS
DMT extracted with D-limonene vs Petrochemical solvents Options
 
chocobeastie
#1 Posted : 12/21/2019 7:54:13 AM
Hi, I've wondered what people think about the quality of the DMT extracted from D-Limonene is, vs using naptha, toluene, xylene etc.

Have you noticed a difference? Purity of experience? Duration? Quality and depth of visions?
 
Levanah
#2 Posted : 5/28/2022 2:48:31 PM
I have not noticed any difference and so probably wouldn't be able to tell any difference in a double blind experiment.

After a number of extractions with d-limonene I will not use it again.

I don't bother if my product is red, brown, white, crystalized or goish.

But with petro ether the extraction method I use (q21q21) is much less a hassle, everything clean and pure and fewer confounding factors that can destroy the extraction which has happened to me recently due to oxidized/old limonene.

Limonene, byebye, thanks for serving me :-)
 
benzyme
Moderator | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertExtreme Chemical expert | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertChemical expert | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertSenior Member | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expert
#3 Posted : 5/29/2022 3:08:03 AM
I still use methylene chloride.

Limonene for tryptophan decarboxylation though.
"Nothing is true, everything is permitted." ~ hassan i sabbah
"Experiments are the only means of attaining knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." -Max Planck
 
Samvidbuho
#4 Posted : 6/7/2022 1:11:17 PM
benzyme, me too.
But don't you find that it is more difficult to crystallize from dcm than say from toluene?

Still, there's no better..
 
 
Users browsing this forum
Guest

DMT-Nexus theme created by The Traveler
This page was generated in 0.012 seconds.