Hey all,

I recently came across this and found it interesting. It could be a whole bunch of bull, but the information is well presented, and thought out in intelligent and concise answers. It has a lot of similarities with The Law of One to those who know that material.

It may not resonate with you, but I found it an interesting read nonetheless. Read at least the first two sessions, keep an open mind...

http://www.illuminati-news.com/00363.html

very interesting article so far..

not for me..

some dude with a consistent story regarding the illuminati, posting on some random forum? And we're supposed to believe that the higher illuminati being would choose that forum because 'it has generally more intelligence than the rest?! Maybe its just me but crap detector light went on right there..

Also he didnt see anything too incredible or new to what he was saying. Just typical 'blabla law of one illuminati obama' kind of thing with not much substance to it. And it had some wrong predictions about end of 2008 and just doesnt 'feel' special in any way. Sure amongst those words there are 'true' things, if you know where to look.. But at least to me doesnt seem more true than any other general mystic illuminati story out there.

I find reading gurdjieff's take on existence much more interesting.. and talk about consistency, if anybody can finish reading the whole 'beelzebub's tales to his grandson', then your mind will be blown I guarantee

doesnt mean i believe any of it..just that its interesting..because i have come up with some of the same ideas...not saying they are true..but ideas none the less..

Same here. Lots of the information I had come across before, but it was a good discussion of the ideas, some of which resonated with me.

What's the value of this? What's to be gained? Why is it that we need some sort of villain? Is it possible that the impenetrable and mysterious qualities attributed the illuminati simply render it as conveniently outside of reach, to the point of justifying inaction? Could this sort of phantasm be a mere distraction from far more complex, dire, and immediate realities?