I was the master and the student. I was reborn again and again but did not die. I'm actually pretty sure I remembered my own physical birth at one point. I'm convinced it was my own birth because I've never experienced any other that I can think of in as much detail. I suppose the imagery of fetal tissues could've come from my own imagination. But then I have to wonder what imagination is; There is plenty of information about fetal tissues encoded in me that I am not consciously able to read. I also contain information on scales, tails and feathers, in case you didn't know. I wasn't sure myself until now.
I realized that language does indeed evolve and that it will eventually evolve further into its final, original form. I feel as though I am a part of language. Is it a coincidence that "heaven" and "hell" both start with the letter "h"? "H": Humanity, Homo sapien, His, Hers, History ("his story", how punny), Holy, Honor, etc. There's plenty of latin fun in there. "Adam" and "Atom"? "Eye" and "I"? I'll admit it's impressive. My physical evolution can be mapped to the evolution of the expression for humanity itself. I'm unsure now of what that same thing will be called in the future. If I had to guess, I would say "One"; It's english and half of binary, and thus half of the modern world. By the way, "English" is also a good candidate that I overlooked until just now, and "Language" as well. Trying to guess is like guessing the next word for "popular". You can track the progression from "rock" to "pop"[ular] to "hip"[ster]. It's funny that new language propagates so quickly purely accidentally. Based on the progression of languages, I wouldn't be surprised if future generations are saying "popular" in ways that involve new letters amended to the english language ("1"="One", e.g.). Looking further than that, higher levels of intelligence will have more advanced ways of saying what is meant by "popular". By more advanced, I mean ways that transcend the spacetime used to propagate good ol fashioned sound. Is language a tool that I use to understand the world, or am I a tool that language uses to understand the world? How can either of us understand anything without there already being a language in place to understand it? What is language anyway? It's a construct that bridges the 4 dimensions, allowing us to connect any two points in spacetime. A consciousness that can comprehend all of spacetime must exist in the 5th dimension. A consciousness that can comprehend all of 5D space must exist in the 6th dimension. etc. etc.
realized realised. Am I the only person who wonders if the internet's magical spell-check is manipulating us into spelling things the "wrong" way?
At a certain point in my trip, I realized that I just wanted to be at peace. But peace is the opposite of what exists: If there is anything, there is not peace. And there can never be peace because energy is conserved. Conserved over?...time. Apparently "conserved" is a higher-dimensional synonym for "constant". What is energy? (It's kg*m^2/s^2) Let's define a word "eternal" to mean constant over all hypothetical dimensions. What physicists and philosophers have been trying to say for billions of years is that energy is eternal. (Funny: "energy" is close to "eternity", vive la difference that language evolution has yet to make up. "vive la difference" was not originally used for the purpose I just used it: Another example of new language evolving and overthrowing old language structures). Now let's refer to the nth time dimension as "time^n". Energy may be "conserved" over time, but that does not mean that it is "eternal". After all, we're missing information from time^2, time^3, and so on. How much information are we missing? There are an infinite number of times along the time^1 axis. For each of those times, there are an infinite number of times along the time^2 axis. For each of those times, there are an infinite number of times along the time^3 axis. So, if we use "inf" to represent infinity, the total number of times in just the first three time dimensions is inf^3. By extrapolation, the total number of times in existence is equal to inf^inf.
Okay, somebody who knows something about set theory should spot me at this point...
Let's define "loginf" as follows: loginf(inf^x)=x. Testing the constancy of energy is a waiting game because we've only waited some finite time, T, which is in the time^loginf(T) dimension. There's something I haven't told you yet: We're going to be at peace eventually somehow. The net amount of energy is zero, and so all energy that "exists" is virtual energy that, according to the schrodinger equation, will oscillate for all time^1. Fortunately for us, the schrodinger equation only takes into account the first dimension of time. I believe that the oscillations will decay over higher dimensions of time as increase in dimension somehow dissipates the energy and acts to dampen the oscillations. In other words, as loginf(T) approaches inf, intelligent beings will evolve into higher and higher dimensions in order to get closer and closer to peace.
Another way of stating this is that as loginf(T) approaches inf, the variance of the energy level, over all spacetime, goes to zero. The problem is that, as an enlightened intelligent aproaches peace, the energy dimension-corrected energy level of the universe will approach the energy required to probe the universe for peace. In other words, we'll have to trust that we are at peace, because checking for peace will raise the dimension-corrected energy level of the universe (I suppose by relowering dimensionality). When we finally attain peace, a single stray thought will cause the Big Bang all over again. It's inevitable, but this swinging back and forth between E=0 everywhere and states of disturbance can be modelled by a transcendent theory of increasing dimensionality, where I presume that inf^inf^inf is the time scale for the NEXT level of peace.
One thing I have not yet considered is that we do not exist in the time^1 dimension but instead exist in some higher dimension. The consequence of this is that we can look for lower dimensional intelligences in addition to higher dimensional ones. I wouldn't call higher dimensional intelligences "higher intelligences" except by convention. Each dimension is simply a quantum state of intelligence, and the filling of every state is necessary for the acquisition of peace. One way of thinking of more advanced intelligences is in terms of how much information they can process in a given period of time.. If a 2D display is transmitting N1 bits of information per unit space in T1 seconds, then the information-processing speed required for an intelligence to fully recieve and interpret the information is S1=2D*N1/T1, where 2D is the number of spatial units over which the information is transmitted. The same amount of information can be displayed using a 1D display if the dimension of time is increased to account for the decrease in dimension in space. For example, we have
S1 = S2
-> 2D*N1/T1 = 1D*N2/T2, sqrt(2D) = 1D (assuming 2D array is a square)
-> sqrt(2D)*N2/T2 = 2D*N1/T1, Set N1=N2=N
-> sqrt(2D)*N/T2 = 2D*N/T1
-> T1/T2 = 2D/sqrt(2D) = 2D^2
If 2D represents 2D space instead of a discrete array, then there are inf^2 points within 2D, and thus the increase in temporal dimensionality of a higher intelligence is inf^4 (That's the 4th time dimension). So, you see, increase in temporal dimensionality is equivalent to increase in temporal speed. It's like shifting gears in a car: Going up a level doesn't take you anywhere particularly new. It just takes you where you were already going much faster. Essentially, a higher intelligence is an equal intelligence existing in higher dimensions of time! Furthermore, we can rate intelligence by information processing power (not surprisingly).
To reconnect this whole thing with language: This model of reality is particular to my current place and time, and to my past experiences. Everyone will come up with their own model of reality. The important thing to remember is that all of our models are the same and that language is the barrier that keeps us from seeing that. The means by which we discover that our models are actually the same will be the language of an evolved intelligence.
New letters are being added to the alphabet all the time. For example, quotation marks did not always exist, and their incorporation mirrors the transition of our talking with words and sentences to our talking about words and sentences. New symbols will be implemented accordingly to allow us to talk about things like quotation marks. etc etc.
then I typed the letter t, then h, then e, then n, then I, then t, then y, then p, then e, then d, then t, then h, then e, then l, then e, then l, then l, then e, then r then t, then t then h, then e, then ....
-Some interesting facts about this sequence of letters: It never repeats and none of the letter used ever drop out of the sequence.
Historical and Future Words for "God"All, Adam, Atom, Alien, Anything, Art, Awake
Beauty
Consciousness, Communication, Creativity, Community
Deity, DNA, Destiny, Desire
Ego, Enlightenment, Energy, Eternity, Everything, Evolution
Father, Family, Forever
God, Growth, Government, Genetics
Humanity, Hero, History, Happiness, Head, Hope, Heritage
"I", Irony, Infinity, Intelligence, Information, Imagination
J
Knowledge
Love, Lord, Law, Life, Language
Man, Meditation, Matter, Music, Mind
Name, Nature
One
Psychedelics, Pleasure, Philosophy, Present, Progress
Question
Reality, Religion, Relationships
Self, Soul, Symbol, Science
Total, Technology, Truth
Unity, Universe, Understanding
Virtue, Values
World, Wisdom, Word
X (I have a far-fetched idea for this one)
You, Yahweh
Z
So as you can see there are a few letters for which God-names have not prospered. Of course you could say that all words are the name of God, but I was trying to think of the most obvious ones. Please let me know if I left any important ones out, and yes, I realize that this an incredibly westernized list and I apologize for that. I left out words like "peace", "nothingness", and "zero" because my current interpretation is that the essence of God is a striving toward peace, peace being some dinstinct "state". My hypothesis, is that letters that prove inadequate in describing God will eventually drop out of the language in the same way that phsyical evolution causes genes to drop out of the genome. Likewise, plenty of letters will be added to the alphabet.
Selflessness is egotistical. I don't really have anything else to say about that. It's just something I realized during the trip.
Thank you very much for reading this. I'd appreciate any input that anyone has or any recommendations on how to make my theory more understandable and succinct.
I love you all.
Hixidom
EDIT 20/10/12: This all seems very difficult to me now. I thought the math would be more straight forward. I'm trying to derive the energy stored in a single dimension of time because my hypothesis is that the sum of energy over all dimensions should be zero; i.e., the sum of the energy of all wave functions in all dimensions of time is zero over all space. My idea stems from the belief that there was nothing at one point before the Big Bang. How did we get from a hypertime with no energy to a hypertime with energy unless energy were NOT conserved over higher dimensions of time? In other words, over higher dimensions of time, some hyperdimensional form of, say, the Schrodinger equation should show the total energy going to zero after an eternity (eternity being the amount of time in all dimensions of time, inf^n time units for n dimensions of time).
EDIT 21/10/12: I've realized that this theory will not work until higher dimensional analogues of the concept of energy have been formulated, which I will now do...
In 2D time, there are inf^2 whereas there are only inf times in 1D time, therefore a particle moving in 2D time progresses with T^2 as opposed to T, and thus 2D motion represents acceleration whereas 1D motion represents velocity. Let us refer to the nth derivative of the position of some particle, with respect to time, as dnx, where velocity=d1x, acceleration=d2x, etc. The mass of a particle is simply m and mass is conserved. The momentum of a particle is m*d1x and momentum is conserved. Energy is integral(Fdx)=md2x*x and is conserved. The energy of a particle in 4D can be described by the relativistic energy equation: E^2=m^2*c^4+p^2*c^2. I argue that this formula only goes so far as to consider energy existing in the first dimension of time, but a more general equation for energy would include energy existing in higher dimensions of time. In other words, if we consider the relativistic energy equation to consist of a time^0 energy term (m^2*c^4) and a time^1 energy term (p^2*c^2), then by extension the time^2 energy term would be E^2 (which apparently is related to lower dimensional energies by the relativistic equation above). I know it seems redundant or circular to add E to the right side of the above equation for energy, but remember that we will be equating the right side of the equation not to E (which represents time^2 energy), but to En, which is the time^n energy. E3 would be integral(md3x dx^2), which is essentially md3x*x^2 (d3x is called "jerk", md3x is called "yank"
. The next energies in the sequence can be expressed similarly. A new energy equation for the nth time dimension would be:
En^2=m^2*c^4+p^2*c^2+E^2+E2^2/c^2...
-> En^2=m^2*c^4+m^2*d1x^2*c^2+m^2*d2x^2*x^2+m^2*d3x^2*x^4/c^2...
-> En^2=m^2*(c^4+sum[i=0->n]{dix^2*x^(2*i)*c^(2*(1-i))})
which is an expanded form of En=sqrt(E0^2+E1^2+E2^2+...), which is just the pythagorean sum of energies in all time dimensions up to time^n.
Notice that the first four energy terms are as follows
E0=m
E1=mvx^0
E2=max^1
E3=mjx^2
The problem with this sequence is that E0 seems to stand out UNLESS we define d0x=x. In that case, E0 could be written as E0=md0x*x^-1, and then the sequence would seem more uniform. This is an interesting assumption because it seems to imply that the 0th time dimension is actually the spatial dimension x. We can imagine accordingly that the -1th time dimension might be y and the -2nd time dimension might be z. How eerie. Anyways, since I have decided that the eternal energy should be equal to zero, the above equation can becomes the following when n=inf:
Einf^2=0=m^2*(c^4+sum[i=0->inf]{dix^2*x^(2*i)*c^(2*(1-i))})
-> 0=sum[i=0->inf]{Ei^2}
According to my hypothesis, this does not only apply to the total energy in the universe but to the energy of ANY object in the universe. After all, momentum is always conserved, so any given change in momentum produces an equal and opposite change in momentum somewhere. Matter an energy are conserved, so any change in energy (E2) produces an equal and opposite change in energy somewhere. Thus it seems appropriate to conclude that the total E2 in the universe is already zero. I already took that to be true. My question is why there was nothing once and now something, and when will there be nothing again. Thus the equation above for Einf, like the relativistic equation, is true for any given particle in the universe. "Schrödinger used the relativistic energy momentum relation to find what is now known as the Klein–Gordon equation", the Klein-Gordon equation being a relativistic version of the schrodinger equation. The same derivation using my hypertemporal relativistic energy equation should yield some sort of hyperdimensional analogue to the schrodinger equation.
EDIT: 22/11/12: I have had little time to think about this lately, but I have made significant progress, progress being the realization that I will have to tear down more and more fundamental physics concepts. It's funny because, the deeper that I dig, the more I realize that even the most basic physics teachings are mere models, based on our intuitions, that just happen to work out really really well. Relativistic effects were never factored in to Newtonian mechanics because they never had to be: Nobody did (nor needed) precise enough measurements to realize that there were other terms in equations such as, say, F=ma that are weighted by a factor of 1/c^2 and thus contribute negligibly.
One thing that I've realized in deriving the equations for my theory is that there will be an additional factor for 1/c^2 for the energy term of every subsequent time dimension. I assume this because (1) a factor of 1/velocity^2 will be needed to make the units words out and (2) c is pretty much the only velocity constant that is used in these types of equations (or in any physics equations that I can think of presently).
The alternative, which I believe I am also leaning heavily toward, is that I will be required to assume that, analogues to c for velocity, there are physical limits on acceleration, jerk, etc. This would be an excellent conclusion for my theory because it would make it testable.
In a previous sub-post I stated:
Quote:2D time progresses with T^2 as opposed to T, and thus 2D motion represents acceleration whereas 1D motion represents velocity
I've since realized that this reasoning is fallacious because, obviously, dx/d(T^n) (my time^n quantity) is not the same thing as dx/(dT)^n (acceleration). My dilemma now is that there are so many different paths I could take in my derivation. I could maintain my original trajectory, which associated the time^n dimension with T^n (and for good dimensional reasons), or I can associate time^n with with nth order motion (velocity, acceleration, jerk, etc), which seems to be more easily integrated with current concepts of energy and motion but has no analogy to higher time dimensions
. I can force the analogy, of course, but it just comes so natural when using T^n for time^n. My confusion between dT^2 and d(T^2) really just represents the break-down of logic that surrounds any arbitrary notation, such as that used for integrals.
Anyways, a maximum acceleration/jerk/etc. is probably a must anyway, but I'll have to learn more about Lorentz transformation in order to rewrite that bit of physics. One thing that really irks me is that there is a finite maximum velocity, c. I mean, if you're going to transform the space and time dimensions so that c is a constant, why not do it in such a way that that constant is infinity? I mean, I get that we can physically measure the speed of light to be a finite constant but, completely ignoring that fact, I don't see why it couldn't be done. The Lorentz transformation is so vital to my derivation because, when applied to E=mc^2, it yields the higher order terms that I hope to translate into a higher dimensional temporal framework. Furthermore, we should note that the quantities that we know as "energy" and "momentum" are simply the rate of change of a particular wavefunction in the time and space dimensions, respectively. My main concern is that there is no such energy associated with the rate of change of the rate of change of such a wavefunction (and higher orders of rates of change), which I believe must be fundamentally associated with some form of energy. Think of it this way: Current physics tells us that if each particle in a system has velocity=0 and acceleration=0, then the energy of the system is equal to the sum of the mass of the system. The physics I'm trying to develop pertains to such systems, except it recognizes that there is motion that transcends velocity and acceleration (jerk, e.g.) and purports that there must be some kinetic energy associated with higher orders of motion which, in turn, are associated with higher orders of rates of change of the wavefunction of the system.
Anyways, I will not have more time to work on this project until January (unless I can finish all of my grad school applications by then, which is a probability).
Every day I am thankful that I was introduced to psychedelic drugs.