We've Moved! Visit our NEW FORUM to join the latest discussions. This is an archive of our previous conversations...

You can find the login page for the old forum here.
CHATPRIVACYDONATELOGINREGISTER
DMT-Nexus
FAQWIKIHEALTH & SAFETYARTATTITUDEACTIVE TOPICS
Cacti comparisons Options
 
AluminumFoilRobots
#1 Posted : 1/16/2011 5:36:25 AM
At this point in the journey, I have the feeling that phenethylamine-containing cacti are my greatest ally, despite having used achuma on only one occasion.

I have worked with DMT a handful of times, and while I find it a magnitude of strength higher than any of the other high-ranking sacred medicines, it is so alien that it cannot be as close a helper to me personally as these cacti...

So here is the question, one that I am sure has been asked a million times: which of these cacti do you resonate with the most?
I have only used the T. bridgseii, but have lined up 8 feet of T. parachanoi; holding these in my hand, feeling them, I do not resonate so much with them as I do with the achuma!
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Fairly responsible Kratom user.

"whenever he drank ayahuasca, he had such beautiful visions that he used to put his hands over his eyes for fear somebody might steal them."
in between the grinding-brakes of a train crash while aluminum-foil robots make obnoxious sex noises on a static-filled walkie-talkie radio.
 
pau
#2 Posted : 1/16/2011 7:20:24 AM
While I've noticed some significant differences between the different T's - and the kinds of journeys they send you on - I've also come to believe that there are just as great differences between specimens of a particular species. These latter differences can arise because of good genes, the way they're raised, temperature, rainfall, and all sorts of things. I used to think that my fav was a T bridgesii, but now I prefer - by FAR - a particular run of the mill looking T pach. So experiment with a few, trade with your friends....
WHOA!
 
 
Users browsing this forum
Guest (2)

DMT-Nexus theme created by The Traveler
This page was generated in 0.008 seconds.