We've Moved! Visit our NEW FORUM to join the latest discussions. This is an archive of our previous conversations...

You can find the login page for the old forum here.
CHATPRIVACYDONATELOGINREGISTER
DMT-Nexus
FAQWIKIHEALTH & SAFETYARTATTITUDEACTIVE TOPICS
STB
pre soaking in vinegar Options
 
justine
#1 Posted : 10/20/2010 7:44:57 PM
Hi all,

I'm about to perform a new extraction and I have a question for you guys : do you think pre soaking in vinegar (without filtering afterwards, so technically a dirty a/b) for
3 days could really improve yields ?

Thanks,
To see the world in a grain of sand, and to see heaven in a wild flower, hold infinity in the palm of your hands, and eternity in an hour.
- William Blake
 
actualfactual
#2 Posted : 10/20/2010 7:55:17 PM
no
 
endlessness
Moderator
#3 Posted : 10/20/2010 11:04:08 PM
Only side-by-side testing would say, and so far I havent heard of any. It would be wonderful if anybody would test this and tell the community about it, this is how the knowledge base grows Smile

Personally my gut feeling says that with prepowdered bark it wont make a difference, maybe with bark that isnt so finely powdered it could help, who knows. It certainly wont hurt though
 
Trickster
Chemical expert
#4 Posted : 10/21/2010 12:15:01 AM
justine wrote:
Hi all,

I'm about to perform a new extraction and I have a question for you guys : do you think pre soaking in vinegar (without filtering afterwards, so technically a dirty a/b) for
3 days could really improve yields ?

Thanks,


What tek are you planning to use?

aloneits wrote:
no


Can you be more specific?

Do not seek the truth, just drop your opinions.
 
Trickster
Chemical expert
#5 Posted : 10/21/2010 9:13:51 PM
Trickster wrote:
What tek are you planning to use?


Actually there is a Hybrid tek (PanoraMIX) that starts with vinegar presoaking. It works, although, IME, it requires additional spice cleaning.
Do not seek the truth, just drop your opinions.
 
 
Users browsing this forum
Guest

DMT-Nexus theme created by The Traveler
This page was generated in 0.009 seconds.