Shayku wrote:Dimitrius, I like your first quote, but not so much the second. It seems to me like every article that speaks of some type of brain research feels compelled to justify it with imminent medical applications. We don't see that as often with space or sea exploration, or with math or physics research. I wish we could collectively get to a point where the quest for knowledge would be fine in itself.
It is the bitter truth, this is unfortunately how science and funding work. If you want to get funding in biomedical research then you have to throw in (in)direct cues to potential medical applications in your grant applications. I get funding for my project from a Cancer-associated trust, and guess what, I can honestly draw very little connections between my research and cancer cure.
Nobody pays you money to do research that has no implications for the society in general. Doing science for science died 100 years ago. Even physicists and mathematicians have to justify their research with imminent applications, might be electronics for instance, communications etc etc.
Need to calculate between salts and freebases?
Click here!
Need to calculate freebase or salt percentage at a given pH?
Click here!