We've Moved! Visit our NEW FORUM to join the latest discussions. This is an archive of our previous conversations...

You can find the login page for the old forum here.
CHATPRIVACYDONATELOGINREGISTER
DMT-Nexus
FAQWIKIHEALTH & SAFETYARTATTITUDEACTIVE TOPICS
«PREV1617181920NEXT»
The official "Is this chem ok to use? / Where can I find ...?" thread Options
 
sawman87
#341 Posted : 3/1/2015 10:53:05 PM
onhemp wrote:
Hello everybody,

sorry for not making an intro but I'm just not that into talking about myself Smile

But I do have some questions and if someone would be so kind to clear some things for me I would really appreciate it. I did go through FAQ a few times but didn't find the right answers or just missed them, in that case, I apologize for wasted time.

so.. SWIM will be doing Q21Q21's Tek ( https://anoniem.org/?htt.../Lime_A/B_Extraction_Tek ) and there are some things SWIM is not sure that are right for it..

No1:
d-limonene https://anoniem.org/?htt...ebay.de/itm/291355560036 it says that is >99%, but can't find the right mdsd. it might be this one but not sure
https://anoniem.org/?htt...duct/fluka/62118?lang=en

No2:
All that SWIM can find in his local store is 9% white vinegar and is not sure how to get it to 5%, or if it will work with 9%.

thank you for the effort and time

have a nice day


hi.
not sure about your d.limo. i use naphtha or xylene.

as for your vinegar mine is also 9% white and it works just the same. and i also use Q21Q21s tek. it is a v good tek imo. i have yielded 1% using this tek on my 1st attempt which i thought was damn good.

edit: one thing i would do is put a drop of you d.limo on a glass dish and let it evaporate away. when its gone check to see if anything is left behind. if glas is clear your good to go.

good luck
 
concombres
#342 Posted : 3/1/2015 11:09:02 PM
sawman87 wrote:
onhemp wrote:
Hello everybody,

sorry for not making an intro but I'm just not that into talking about myself Smile

But I do have some questions and if someone would be so kind to clear some things for me I would really appreciate it. I did go through FAQ a few times but didn't find the right answers or just missed them, in that case, I apologize for wasted time.

so.. SWIM will be doing Q21Q21's Tek ( https://anoniem.org/?htt.../Lime_A/B_Extraction_Tek ) and there are some things SWIM is not sure that are right for it..

No1:
d-limonene https://anoniem.org/?htt...ebay.de/itm/291355560036 it says that is >99%, but can't find the right mdsd. it might be this one but not sure
https://anoniem.org/?htt...duct/fluka/62118?lang=en

No2:
All that SWIM can find in his local store is 9% white vinegar and is not sure how to get it to 5%, or if it will work with 9%.

thank you for the effort and time

have a nice day


hi.
not sure about your d.limo. i use naphtha or xylene.

as for your vinegar mine is also 9% white and it works just the same. and i also use Q21Q21s tek. it is a v good tek imo. i have yielded 1% using this tek on my 1st attempt which i thought was damn good.

edit: one thing i would do is put a drop of you d.limo on a glass dish and let it evaporate away. when its gone check to see if anything is left behind. if glas is clear your good to go.

good luck


Limo does not evap cleanly regardless of purity. There is a u.s. based supplier that sells 98.5% minimum purity limonene that is all natural with no surfacants or or additives. Even at that purity it leaves some residue.
 
sawman87
#343 Posted : 3/1/2015 11:30:03 PM
concombres wrote:


Limo does not evap cleanly regardless of purity. There is a u.s. based supplier that sells 98.5% minimum purity limonene that is all natural with no surfacants or or additives. Even at that purity it leaves some residue.


oh. okay thanks i did not know this.
 
concombres
#344 Posted : 3/1/2015 11:54:19 PM
sawman87 wrote:
concombres wrote:


Limo does not evap cleanly regardless of purity. There is a u.s. based supplier that sells 98.5% minimum purity limonene that is all natural with no surfacants or or additives. Even at that purity it leaves some residue.


oh. okay thanks i did not know this.


Thats why with aromatics normally you'd salt out. They smell extremely strong & evap slowly & poorly.

 
benzyme
Moderator | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertExtreme Chemical expert | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertChemical expert | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertSenior Member | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expert
#345 Posted : 3/2/2015 2:15:19 AM
yep.

that's what rotary evaporators are for. heating a rotating flask of solvent in a heated water (or oil) bath, under vacuum.
"Nothing is true, everything is permitted." ~ hassan i sabbah
"Experiments are the only means of attaining knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." -Max Planck
 
concombres
#346 Posted : 3/2/2015 2:37:28 AM
benzyme wrote:
yep.

that's what rotary evaporators are for. heating a rotating flask of solvent in a heated water (or oil) bath, under vacuum.


wish i had the money for a rotovape.
Nice piece if equipment.
Maybe sometime in the distant future when i have training & a real reason to have this type of equipment lying around Laughing
 
pitubo
Senior Member
#347 Posted : 4/3/2015 1:07:36 AM
CosmicSerpent wrote:
I found this on reddit. I don't know if this statements in the tek is right.
the tek seems good ,it have's a defat with sunflower-oil.

Sunflower oil is a fat. It sounds a bit strange to use a fat for defatting. Maybe it works, I did not try it. But if I have to judge by the standards of the rest of the write-up, I have many doubts.

dude at reddit.com wrote:
So many of you still post about not being able to find naphtha or xylene in your country/local area. Don't extract with hydrocarbon solvents. Even using state of the art vacuum filters and ovens you're NEVER going to get 100% of a solvent off of an extracted product. EVER. That means you and your dumb buddies dicking around in your kitchen are ABSOLUTELY going to end up with a contaminated extract if you employ said methods. A friend of mine tells me that spice extracted with these heavy solvents absolutely have a taste to them that spice made with acetone or ethanol doesn't; if it's present enough to be tasted there's more than a negligible amount left over in your batch.

If clean hydrocarbons are used and the product is dried correctly, the amount of solvents left is negligible. The above is just FUD, as there are so many volatile chemicals present in the average human inhabited environment that the small amount of resident solvent is insignificant in comparison.

dude at reddit.com wrote:
Your body can't break these molecules down. That means years from now those bits of naptha or xylene that you inhaled or ate are still gonna be bouncing around your bloodstream stealing electrons from other molecules in your body and suffocating your cells (yes, this also means that you shouldn't make BHO and should dab QWET hash oil instead). There's enough carcinogenic shit in our environment today as it is. You shouldn't be ingesting any of it at all, much less when your undergoing healing and your nervous system is as sensitive to outside stimuli as it can be.

FUD FUD FUD. "stealing electrons from other molecules in your body and suffocating your cells". Sigh.

After decarboxylation, BHO really doesn't have much butane in it. It is a lot harder to get ethanol out of hash oil than butane. What is more carcinogenous at the relevant exposure levels: the butane remnants, the ethanol remnants or whatever crap that results from pyrolysis of the oil? Has the author ever observed the considerable amounts of smog and pollution that tends to accumulate onto cannabis leaves and that is coextracted with most methods?

dude at reddit.com wrote:
Ethanol is also relatively non-toxic. Your body can break ethanol down. Alcohol is neurotoxic and carcinogenic but we all know that taking a sip of beer realistically isn't going to cause you that much cancer.

Nor is a few molecules of butane or naphtha. The body breaks those down too. It creates toxic metabolites to a degree, just like the breakdown of ethanol creates toxic acetaldehyde.

dude at reddit.com wrote:
Ethanol is an incredible solvent which also makes some very tasty hash oil if used correctly.

IMHO ethanol in hash oil tastes like crap if you smoke it.

dude at reddit.com wrote:
If you use ethanol keep in mind that it can't be concentrated more than 96% because it reacts with itself above those concentrations so some sodium carbonate might carry over in the remaining 4% of water, but it won't be a lot by any means If it does don't freak out-it can't burn when you smoke this stuff and isn't toxic.

Great chemistry explanations here.

dude at reddit.com wrote:
Non-toxic is the key thing here.

Can I has a non-FUD version?
 
Elijah Phoenix
#348 Posted : 4/15/2015 8:24:15 PM
Okay, so I would like clarification on IPA toxicity. Can someone provide evidence of toxic byproducts left after evaporation? IPA is metabolized into acetone in the body, which the body can breakdown since its a natural byproduct of the body. I have anhydrous IPA. I don't know what the .1% in this product is. Is there really a contamination I need to be concerned with? I use it to remove acacia sacrament from sodium carb. I could use 100% acetone, I suspect this a bit more flammable though requiring further caution. I want toxic exposure at a minimum, so I hope someone can concisely expound upon this suggested IPA byproduct contamination after full evaporation.

To update this post:

I have reviewed the msds and not found any conclusive evidence of toxic by products post evaporation nor was .01-.02% of non primary ingredient of the isopropyl contents shown. At this point in time, I have no evidence to support that there is a toxic leftover after using isopropyl, other than heresay. I will proceed with caution, but assume that within a community such as the Nexus, a few days without someone proclaiming such a toxicity, it is unlikely a concern. It is something that I do take into great consideration. Thank you for the opportunity to be inspired to reach for more.
 
downwardsfromzero
ModeratorChemical expert
#349 Posted : 4/22/2015 1:10:53 AM
I'd say you'll be fine with IPA. If it's HPLC grade there's nothing to worry about. Rubbing alcohol may contain bitrex and thus require distillation before use.




“There is a way of manipulating matter and energy so as to produce what modern scientists call 'a field of force'. The field acts on the observer and puts him in a privileged position vis-à-vis the universe. From this position he has access to the realities which are ordinarily hidden from us by time and space, matter and energy. This is what we call the Great Work."
― Jacques Bergier, quoting Fulcanelli
 
Naabi
#350 Posted : 5/29/2015 2:55:22 PM
Hey! Jumping in for a few questions Smile


1. I'm planning on doing Q21Q21's vinegar tek with sodium carbonate instead of lyme, can I do this? I read about sodium carbonate creating foam when in acidic water, but adding it slowly might do the trick, is it true?

2. I can't find 5% vinegar anywhere, all vinegars at department stores over here are 4% tops. I've been using the 4% with decent results but am I losing DMT because of it?
 
LSDvibes
#351 Posted : 5/29/2015 4:40:18 PM
Naabi wrote:
Hey! Jumping in for a few questions Smile


1. I'm planning on doing Q21Q21's vinegar tek with sodium carbonate instead of lyme, can I do this? I read about sodium carbonate creating foam when in acidic water, but adding it slowly might do the trick, is it true?

2. I can't find 5% vinegar anywhere, all vinegars at department stores over here are 4% tops. I've been using the 4% with decent results but am I losing DMT because of it?


1. I also have had the same question as you with regards to whether or not the pickling lime could be replaced with sodium carbonate. In my imagination, I have been working with this tek with ACRB and so far my pulls haven't been precipitating well. I heard from endlessness that if you use sodium carbonate as the base, you will have to use a lot of it to get the pH high enough. I think pH papers would be useful in assessing this although I forget what the minimum pH is needed to extract the DMT.
Yes, you will have to add the sodium carbonate very slowly at first to the acidified mix. I learned this the hard way, it foams like crazy!

2. I'm guessing that 4% vinegar should work, maybe you can add a little more than the tek calls for. (But don't over-acidify, especially when working with sodium carbonate as your base.) PH papers could help here too but I don't know the pH to aim for, most of the teks just have an amount of vinegar/water to add?

 
Naabi
#352 Posted : 5/30/2015 3:41:24 PM
LSDvibes wrote:

1. I also have had the same question as you with regards to whether or not the pickling lime could be replaced with sodium carbonate. In my imagination, I have been working with this tek with ACRB and so far my pulls haven't been precipitating well. I heard from endlessness that if you use sodium carbonate as the base, you will have to use a lot of it to get the pH high enough. I think pH papers would be useful in assessing this although I forget what the minimum pH is needed to extract the DMT.
Yes, you will have to add the sodium carbonate very slowly at first to the acidified mix. I learned this the hard way, it foams like crazy!

2. I'm guessing that 4% vinegar should work, maybe you can add a little more than the tek calls for. (But don't over-acidify, especially when working with sodium carbonate as your base.) PH papers could help here too but I don't know the pH to aim for, most of the teks just have an amount of vinegar/water to add?



Thank you for the answers! Very slowly means like one tablespoon at a time or less than that?
I think I'm trying this method today, I can write my results with sodium carbonate later if anyone's interested...
 
kubizm
#353 Posted : 6/2/2015 12:10:58 PM
Hey everyone, how's it going?
I have a few questions but some Calcium Hydroxide I can source locally.
It's not pure, it has other additives however I have looked up each compound,

The components are;
Calcium Hydroxide -- 85-95%
Magnesium hydroxide -- 0.5-1.5%
Silicon dioxide -- 0.4-0.7%
Aluminum oxide -- 0-2%
Iron (III) oxide -- 0-0.7%

The magnesium hydroxide is safe to consume, according to Wikipedia, Magnesium hydroxide is a common component of antacids and laxatives. - which I'm not concerned about ingesting if it ends up in the final product.

Silicon Dioxide according to Wikipedia, Silica ingested orally is essentially nontoxic. But again, would this make it into the final product?

Aluminum Oxide and Iron (III) Oxide I looked up and is insoluble in water.

So my final question is, can I mix an excess amount of this 'Calcium Hydroxide' with water and filter out the aluminum oxide and Iron oxide, to leave a basic solution to use for extractions?

Thanks to anyone who can help! Very happy

I've also attached the msds.
I stole a globe map, saw the world for the taking!
 
TGO
Welcoming committee
#354 Posted : 6/19/2015 1:51:16 AM
^^^Have you looked into "Mrs. Wages Pickling Lime?" ... it is relatively cheap and can be bought online and is pure Calcium hydroxide! ... ... ...

Okay soo...

My question involves ammonia and this Syrian Rue extraction. The ammonia I have has two ingredients:

1. Ammonium Hydroxide
2. Surfactant

Now, normally I just use Sodium carbonate during the last step to precipitate Harmaline/Harmine out of the liquid. I read somewhere that Janitorial strength ammonia 10% is sufficient for this step and can be used in place of sodium carbonate (I can't seem to find janitorial strength ammonia anywhere at local stores for some reason). Are surfactants a bad thing? It is my understanding that surfactants are:

"Surfactants (surface active agents) can be broadly defined as compounds which, when dissolved in water, concentrate at surfaces (interfaces) such as water-air or water- oil. The interfacial activity of these substances, which can be explained in terms of their molecular structure, gives rise to a wide range of surface chemistry functions: wetting, emulsifying, solubilising, foaming/defoaming, rheology-modifying, antistatic, 'glossing', lubricity and surface conditioning." SOURCE

If the ammonia was pure, I'd assume that I would dilute it to 10% (assuming 10% is correct) but I get this feeling that surfactants are something I do not want when using a chemical in an extraction...?

Keep in mind that I am perfectly happy using sodium carbonate. Baking soda is cheap and can easily be converted so that isn't the issue. I am just curious as to what kind of ammonia or what dilution of ammonia is needed to create the same results (or similar results) as sodium carbonate...?

Any input is greatly appreciated and I apologize if this should have been posted in the Harmala section but it seems that this is more a chemical question than a Harmala extraction question!

Thank you!
New to The Nexus? Check These Out:



One Fish Two Fish Red Fish Blue Fish

 
JSTAR
#355 Posted : 8/19/2015 2:14:52 AM
Hi great people of the Nexus.

Just wanting to check which of these is the best choice of Naptha! Thanks for your time Big grin

Ingredient CAS # Concentration %
Petrolium Naphtha 64742‐49‐0 >50
Toxicological information:
Cyclohexane LD50 813mg/kg
Heptane LD50 222mg/kg
Heptane LD50 2250mg/kg
or
%
>60 liquid hydrocarbons
13 n-hexane
<=5 aromatic hydrocarbons total, including
1 ethylbenzene
<=0.1 benzene
1 C8 and higher aromatics
or
Heptane and isomers 35 - 55
Cyclohexane 25 – 35
Methylcyclohexane < 15
Hexane <10
or
n-Hexane / 110-54-3 / 10 - 30
Ethylbenzene / 100-41-4 / < 10
Note – product contains < 0.1% benzene

Thank you so much for your time

 
FLeP
#356 Posted : 8/19/2015 3:00:50 PM
Definitely the first one. But it would be nice if we could get someone else to chime in because I'm not 100 percent sure on how useful cyclohexane is for our purposes. The heptane is fine, awesome. From what I can find cyclohexane acts much like hexane so it should work just fine. You'll probably want to do heated pulls to increase the solubility of all that heptane.

You don't want the aromatic hydrocarbons listed in the second one. That stuff is not desirable for our purposes.
 
JSTAR
#357 Posted : 8/23/2015 11:52:47 PM
Thanks a lot Flep!

Cool
 
Quetzal7
#358 Posted : 8/24/2015 12:51:56 AM
First time i gonna use d-limonene ;
may i ask you if you know about the quality of this one :

http://www.ebay.com/itm/...il-X5-fold-/301071071199

sound a really good price Smile
thanks Smile
 
Naabi
#359 Posted : 8/24/2015 11:22:26 PM
Hello!

I want to start making DMT again but I could only find pure d-limonene in one store and they don't have it right now. I found something called DL-90, made of d-limonene and nonionic surfactants (and also DL-40 but I imagine it's more impure). Can I use this?
 
concombres
#360 Posted : 8/25/2015 3:27:56 AM
Naabi wrote:
Hello!

I want to start making DMT again but I could only find pure d-limonene in one store and they don't have it right now. I found something called DL-90, made of d-limonene and nonionic surfactants (and also DL-40 but I imagine it's more impure). Can I use this?


Do NOT use this. The surfactants may be non toxic but you do not want them in your DMT.
They were not intended to be smoked & are potentially toxic when ingested via this route.

Limonene is easy to find online.
The best option imo is a factory that produces limonene as an all purpose cleaner in Florida. It comes in glass bottles & has different purities ranging from 95-98.5%(the 98.5% being minimum purity for the higher purity stuff).

Shipping makes it rather expensive, but it is well worth it.

No surfactants or additives.
 
«PREV1617181920NEXT»
 
Users browsing this forum
Guest

DMT-Nexus theme created by The Traveler
This page was generated in 0.098 seconds.