Link to site

What say you

Nice I have an uncle that literally despises me because I smoke weed. He thinks that I'm ruining my life with it.

Meanwhlie he continues to smoke 2-3 packs of cigarettes per day despite the fact that he has LYMPHOMA, and smokes even while going through KEMO which costs him thousands upon thousands of dollars....he actually threw a fit because they would not let him smoke DURING kemo...

He probably would not be too keen on this cure..


IMO the pharm companies look at Cancer like a huge money maker, I bet they do evrything they can to insure cures are not found...especially cheap cures like this.

The article says natural marijuana is bad for and synthetic CBD is good for you.... I mean smoking might be bad for you, but I don't think THC is bad if injested

This is just as much a pharmaceutical promo as any to make synthetic cannabanoids and just bypass Cannabis as a natural medicine all together.

Maybe it'll help the case to stop a war on a plant, but I think they'll just keep messing with us. Take a look at the drug schedule system, the drug war is total nonsense.

Agreed. I recently seen a study which I think was done by the UK government themselves, it was a risk assessment of how dangerous each drug was and what potential it had for causing problems, and the results were wildly contrasted to how the law deals with different classes (schedules). So for example the report found that psilocybin mushrooms are very safe, yet they are Class A (schedule I) and on the opposite end of the spectrum there are things like GHB which can be quite easily overdosed on and can even result in death, yet it is Class C (the lowest class). There just doesn't seem to be any basis for the stated goal of drug legislation, to "protect" people from the drugs. Naturally, tobacco and alcohol topped the list alongside heroin.

Interesting.. 'turn off' ID-1 which is solely responsible for spreading cancerous cells? Sounds too good to be true. Here all these pharm companies and organizations have been gathering millions of dollars to find some elaborate synthesized cure, when all along the cure was in marijuana? All I can say is... LOL.

You should all check out this video on Utube called 'run from the cure'. It's about some old man using weed oil to cure lot's of people's cancers.......and now he is in jail


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0psJhQHk_GI

If you smoke it, i think the negative impact on the lungs would still outweigh the positive effects. Sooting ones lungs is never gonna be positive. I know quite a few daily cannabis smokers with a nasty cough. You know, when they cough it sounds like they´re retching and they talk with that hoarse sound like they´ve been working on the stockmarket for a hundred years.

would vaporization negate these effects?
either way though, oral administration is gaining popularity (especially in medicinal clinics)

Yes.

Vaporization spares you the nasty byproducts of combustion.