Lagomorph wrote:Nationalism doesn't have to be retrograde. Not only did it serve a purpose when it first developed, it continues to serve a purpose as part of the foundation for what has come after. Healthy pride in one's groups, including countries, helps preserve cultures and the sense of places being different from one another. This is part of the problem of corporation globalization, the homogenization issue. Do we really want Thailand to look like Paris to look like Ohio, all with a convenient Starbucks?
I'm not sure about this. The attacks in Libya & Egypt yesterday have flared up a very nascent nationalism in me. I'm still
very much against nationalism in principle... but the idea that people attack the US because we have
freedom of speech (to an extent) and that an Egyptian filmmaker could make his critique of Islam film in California both sickens me and angers me. That
anger is the basis for the nationalistic feelings that I see in distorted and grotesque forms in über patriotic militia, xenophobes, right wing fascists and isolationists.
The quandary here is that the starkest representations of evil we have witnessed tended to be expressions of nationalism. The NAZI party was the
embodiment of nationalism gone awry.
I think your fear that cultures will disappear is only justified in part. Europe, for example, has not lost their very distinct cultures by becoming the EU and one of the most globalized zones on the planet. Germans will never be French despite sharing a border, a history (each being almost 1/3rd of the Holy Roman Empire of Charlemagne), religious affiliations and more. There is no danger that the Dutch will lose their Dutchness and become like Spain... or that the Irish will wake up one day and be Italian.
Of course, on the other side of the coin... you
do see a lot of homogenization around the world. Embarrassingly, the bulk of it seems to be the rest of the world becoming more like Orange County. No offense to the OC, but there are far cooler areas of California to ape...
far cooler areas of SoCal even.
My experience, though, is that a lot of this is
by choice in the people.
I used to be part of an organization that was dedicated to preserving languages. We have lost 60% of the world's languages in about 100 years and are set to lose 50% of what is left in the next 30. And yet, time and time again... I would find that these languages were being lost
on purpose. Not always, but in 80% of the cases I observed, the elders were
purposefully not teaching the language to their kids and forcing them to learn the lingua franca (usually Spanish or English) because they wanted them to have more opportunities in life.
This is rough, but at some point you realize that you can not force people to preserve their cultures if they don't want. Anthropologists and linguists can rush around the world and do their best... but they work too slowly. And, meanwhile, good chunks of human discovery, wisdom and ingenuity fall by the wayside. People can not be forced to continue to make local fermented millet mash in Africa when they prefer to drink German beer.
Quote:Hyperspace Fool wrote:If the human race hasn't killed itself off in 1000 years, I am 99.9% sure we will have a global governance system and a resource based economy.
Unless we've reverted to a permanent tribal stone-age, unable to access easily worked metals that were already long ago stripped from the easy to reach depths of the earth's surface. (This is the scenario laid out in Hank Wesselman's
Spiritwalker.)
Yes. That is also a possibility... though probably not from lack of metals as much as from a cataclysm that only kills off 90% of us or so. Asteroid strike, supervolcano, nuclear winter etc.
I should have said that in 1000 years we will either be extinct, a global unified human race that has spread to the stars, or isolated tribal remnants scratching out subsistence in a hostile environment.
I vote for option #2. Note there is no option for the continued existence of today's nation-states model. (OK, if the cataclysm happens in 200 years... it is possible the tribal post-apocalypse might have progressed into the nation-state period by then.)
I still vote for option #2.
Anyway, glad to meet another progressive, global minded Californian... even in the virtual. California Über Alles!
"Curiouser and curiouser..." ~ Alice
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is found written in your religious books. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders. Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it." ~ Buddha