here's some ok news, the B.C. Civil Liberties Association is opposing the criminalization of salvia in Canada. I am glad to see that an actual "association" is speaking up about this.
http://www.bccla.org/pressreleases/11Salvia.htmlhttp://www.bccla.org/pre.../11salvia_submission.pdfI read this news shortly after the Prime Minister of Canada was found in CONTEMPT OF PARLIMENT for with withholding documentation on their massive prison expansion agenda. Crime rates have been steadily falling in Canada for decades, yet prison population has been growing, and the conservative government wants to increase the trend of sending more citizens to prison..... while not disclosing this agenda, nor the cost of their agenda. Now they've been found in contempt of parliment for it. I hope people are able to see what they're trying to, and how it is unacceptable.
http://rabble.ca/news/20...ors-purple-file-politics"These online forums will have to debate a new and very serious historical precedent -- the Conservative Party may be the first party to be held in prima facie contempt of Parliament for obstructing a comprehensive review of their prison platform. Last Wednesday, they slammed down a 45-cm tome on the Speaker's desk -- an epic volume which prices 18 new crime bills at $631 million and 2,700 additional places in new prisons at $2.1 billion. This is estimated at only 55 per cent of the true cost of the tough-on-crime legislation according to Kevin Page, the parliamentary budget watchdog."
Not very nice, if you ask me. They want to introduce new laws so they can send more people to prison, and spend more money on building prisons. I don't know how the average person could tolerate this agenda. Well, anyway, the synchronicity of the conservative party being found in contempt of parliment for being reckless with their crime bills and prison agenda, does not look at the same time they are proposing a new crime bill to criminalize salvia. The fact that they have been found in contempt of parliment for their crime agendas does not put much good faith in any new crime bill they suggest at this point.